#Bocas2017: 4 Powerful Questions with Safiya Sinclair, Ishion Hutchinson and Rajiv Mohabir
Shivanee Ramlochan, Rajiv Mohabir, Ishion Hutchinson and Safiya Sinclair
The ideas
expressed in their combined, titanic body of work range from: the strength of
heritage, brokenness of history, existence of a Caribbean people, religion,
unique rhythm of Caribbean poetry, elemental aspects of life as well as music
and history among many others.
Ramlochan
ignited the fire with her first question directed at Hutchinson: “William Logan
calls it (House of Lords and Commons) a book of a young man. He stated
that before a poet breaks the wild horses of invention, he must capture them.
How do you contend with such polite condescension?”
The audience
hummed with obvious disdain for the half-masked comment. “My friends and our
conversations help me to deal with being both private and public,” Hutchinson
stated. Hutchinson went on to indicate that the editor’s comments did not
disturb him because he does not feel that it is a critical discourse requiring
a response. He emphasized his indifference by shrugging his shoulder and using
the Jamaican multi expressive statement, “Cha and so it go.”
Sinclair,
responding to the same question, stated boldly, “I don’t. For me, it’s just
white noise, literally.” The other panelists showed their approval of her
response with head nods. “I can’t pay attention to it. What is important is
bettering the work.” Mohabir revealed that he deals with the situation by
writing passive aggressive essays and publishing them in ‘white’
journals.
Next, the use of the word ‘new’ is
debated. Ramlochan asks, “Caribbean poetry’s new wave- new for whom, new to
who, new from whom?”
Sinclair
explored: “It’s not new to us- Caribbean, diaspora, marginalized.” She
gave the example of persons who seemingly woke up to atrocities of history and
the present only when someone they didn’t agree with won the election. The newness
of the situation was only felt by those who have lived a privileged life. Those
who were granted the privilege of ignorance. However, this is the reality of
others.
Hutchinson
pursued a divergent thread of the issue. He states that there are different
ways to think of new. When a poet writes, he makes a new slant even when
the topic has already been written about. He furthers, it is about “making the
familiar strange.”
Mohabir added that “our black and brown bodies have been written about” for a
long time. He emphasized the exchange of power that now occurs. He contended
that what is new is that it is now being written about by the actual
owners of the bodies. "I try to approach each poem with new
eyes," he stated.
What to do with outrage on the page?
Does anger kill the poetry or is it okay to deal with this anger on the page?
How do you deal with this anger?
The three
writers explored this question in different ways. Mohabir stated that through
writing, we channel this "anger, racisms and subtle racisms." The
page helps us deal with the injustices. While, Hutchinson believes that
"the syntax indicates its passion." He continued, “Something jarring
happens at the level of syntax.” Using the unevenness of the tercet, he
contended that this may best suit the political unevenness of the day. “I am
always searching for the ways in which I can see the poet is under duress in
her craft apart from the politics,” he ended. "As a black, Jamaican woman,
people always think I’m angry. I could sneeze and people think I’m angry,”
Sinclair offered. “I am simply writing about things that need to be dismantled and
if that’s me channeling my anger then I guess that’s what I’m doing.”
How do prize-givings and monetary
residency, etc. affect the work? Is the white jury different from white
noise?
This potentially
contentious question presented a valuable opportunity for the writers to
address what may be seen as an inconsistency in thought. They all agreed that
any earnings are well deserved. Sinclair views them as her
"reparations." Hutchinson, though agreeing that earnings are well-
deserved, reminded the audience that his world is Jamaica and though elements
on the outside present a boost; nothing takes precedence. Mohabir agreed that
anything is gained is rightfully so. He also believes in #takeitall.
Comments
Post a Comment